The Mayans predicted 21st December 2012 as the end of days.
January 5th, 2012 comes a close second as David Cameron picked this day to get a head start on the Mayans and launch his government’s ‘Year of Living Dangerously’ – for you and me, that is.
Let us review recent events…because this government seems determined to keep reviewing health and safety legislation until it gets the answer it wants…
In October 2010, Lord Young’s report – ‘Common Sense, Common Safety’ stated on page 19 that:
‘Britain’s compensation culture is fuelled by media stories about individuals receiving large compensation pay outs for personal injury claims.
The problem of the compensation culture prevalent in society today is, however, one of perception rather than reality.’
Lord Young’s report was welcomed by the government.
In November 2011, Professor Ragnar Lofstedt concluded in his report – ‘Reclaiming health and safety for all. An independent review of health and safety legislation’ that:
‘In general, there is no need for radically altering current health and safety legislation.‘
He went on to say that he wanted businesses to :
‘reclaim ownership of the management of health and safety and see it as a vital part of their operation rather than an unnecessary and bureaucratic paperwork exercise.’
Professor Lofstedt’s report was welcomed by the government.
However, on 5th January 2012, the Prime Minister stood the core findings of these reports on their heads and launched a vitriolic assault on accident victims and their legal representatives as he endeavoured to sell the British public the idea that health and safety legislation is bad for business.
He pledged to ‘slay the health and safety monster.’
He vowed to make 2012 the year we ‘kill off the health and safety culture for good.’
He fumed that ‘health and safety legislation has been an albatross around the neck of British business.’
He promised that ‘our plan will deter the speculative health and safety chancers who leech off good businesses.’
Either he hasn’t read these reports;commissioned by his own government, or he has chosen to ignore their findings and twist their conclusions to suit his own agenda, which is quite remarkably in tune with the agenda promoted by the Association of British Insurers.
The ABI has been invited to a Number 10 ‘summit’ to discuss how to dismantle 178 years of progress in health and safety regulation designed to protect British workers and the British public.
Quite apart from the appallingly injudicious language employed by the PM and his tabloid-toadying populist sound bites, his policy makes no commercial sense whatsoever.
Here’s the counter argument as proposed by a senior US government official, which we highlighted in our blog of 16th February last year…
David Michaels, Assistant Secretary for Labor in the US Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration had a lot to say on the subject of health and safety regulation and jobs:
‘Despite concerns about the effect of regulation on American business, there is clear evidence that OSHA’s common sense regulations have made working conditions in this country far safer than 40 year’s ago when this agency was created, while at the same time protecting American jobs.
The truth is that OSHA standards don’t kill jobs. They stop jobs from killing workers.
OSHA standards don’t just prevent worker injuries and illnesses, they also drive technological innovation, making industry more competitive.’
Despite the weight of evidence proving that robust health and safety legislation actually improves the health of the economy, the government is hell-bent on making its point in 2012.
Let’s hope that someone in the cabinet has enough spirit and common sense to speak up for our well-being before we revert back to the worst excesses of rogue factory owners and ‘laissez-faire’ employee exploitation that treated worker safety as an impediment to profit.